Mother-in-law sends worst email ever to bride: forgivable? - Love + Sex on Shine
New term: mom-zilla. We know all about temporary bridal insanity, and the underreported groom version, but in some families, it's the parents who are seized by irrational wedding meltdowns.
Last month, 60-year-old British florist and total mom-zilla, Carolyn Bourne attacked. After her stepson's bride-to-be, Heidi Withers, was a guest in her house she had a thing or two to teach her before she entered the Bourne family.
So Bourne sent the 29-year-old a soul-crushing email. The subject line: "Your lack of manners." The bullet points for the bride, in paraphrase: her wedding is going to be tacky, she's too picky of an eater, her sense of humor sucks, and her stepson is making a dreadful choice in marrying her. And one more thing: her out-of-work parents are cheap.
When Withers received the email (Bourne sent it three times to be sure) she did what anyone would do: she forwarded it to a few friends to share in the shock. What was the alternative -respond with a 'frowny' face? But instead of simply offering advice, some anonymous friend got pro-active and forwarded Bourne's e-attack, launching a viral sensation in a matter of hours. Now everyone in the Western Hemisphere has laid eyes on Bourne's email.
In a way, it's the ultimate revenge on a mother-in-law who needed to be put in her place after such power-mongering. But it's not going to make for smooth wedding. Bourne has been labeled the mother-in-law from hell by media outlets and Withers' father Alan has fueled the fire by publicly calling Bourne "Miss fancy pants." Now parents on both sides of the couple are fueding and nobody's manners are in check. Suggestion for Heidi and Freddie, her groom: elope.
Bourne has told London's Telegraph she still plans to attend the wedding, but will maintain a "dignified silence." She may know about English etiquette but she's clueless about the cardinal rule of the Internet: never send an email you don't want the world to see. You almost have to feel bad for the lady, mom-zilla or not. That is, until you read the actual email she sent Withers. Here's an excerpt:
from: Carolyn Bourne
to: heidi withers
subject: your lack of manners
Here are a few examples of your lack of manners:
When you are a guest in another's house, you do not declare what you will and will not eat - unless you are positively allergic to something.
You do not remark that you do not have enough food.
You do not start before everyone else.
You do not take additional helpings without being invited to by your host.
When a guest in another's house, you do not lie in bed until late morning in households that rise early - you fall in line with house norms.
You should never ever insult the family you are about to join at any time and most definitely not in public. I gather you passed this off as a joke but the reaction in the pub was one of shock, not laughter.
You regularly draw attention to yourself. Perhaps you should ask yourself why. No one gets married in a castle unless they own it. It is brash, celebrity style behaviour.
I understand your parents are unable to contribute very much towards the cost of your wedding. (There is nothing wrong with that except that convention is such that one might presume they would have saved over the years for their daughters' marriages.)
If this is the case, it would be most ladylike and gracious to lower your sights and have a modest wedding as befits both your incomes.
One could be accused of thinking that Heidi Withers must be patting herself on the back for having caught a most eligible young man. I pity Freddie.
Ouch. There's no denying it's harsh, but if you've ever been in the line of fire in a wedding party, you know marriage anxieties strike darkness in the hearts of man. What do you think: Is this mom's email forgivable?
Sunday, June 12, 2011
Sunday School Video
Okay, here's this week's Sunday school article. I posted the video description from YOU TUBE below the video.
Uploaded by DarkMatter2525 on Jun 5, 2011
Even Jesus thinks you're idiots.
Spread this video or make your own so that Bastrop High School, and other such schools, cannot easily get away with this deplorable behavior without being seen by thousands of atheists, secularists, moderates, etc.
Link to Bastrop High School:
http://mpsb.us/education/components/scrapbook/default.php?sectiondetailid=104...
GrapplingIgnorance's excellent video on this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zm89ef4v6i0
Facebook group for Damon Fowler:
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Support-Damon/103714833051042
Damon Fowler explains his story here:
http://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/hed7y/threatened_to_contact_aclu_for...
Why is it unconstitutional?
First, nobody is stopping prayer, but it is public funding of the prayer that's the problem. If I owned a home near Bastrop High School, then the real estate taxes I must pay by LAW would be used for an organized prayer using facilities, equipment, and employees I paid for - AN ATHEIST BEING FORCED BY LAW TO PAY FOR PRAYER. It is obvious that is unconstitutional. If Gabriel Broadway wanted to privately fund a separate meeting for a prayer, she's perfectly within her rights to do so. Bottom line: pray on your own time and your own dime.
.
If you need further elaboration, here is a PM I wrote on the matter:
.
Endorsement is different than accommodation.
.
If a Muslim's religion requires him to pray during school hours (a public school), then by law, the school is not allowed to prevent him from doing so (accommodation). I believe that I have proven beyond the shadow of any doubt, that Christianity doesn't REQUIRE a large public prayer at a graduation ceremony, and that, in fact, the religion actually discourages it. Therefore, it is not unconstitutional to prevent her from doing something like that. A case can be made, however, for her to be stopped from doing something like that if she is using the public's resources in the process (endorsement).
.
I know you don't think this is a big deal, and I can understand why you think so. It can seem petty. As someone who owns a lot of real estate, however, I can look at my tax bills and see exactly how much of my money is going to the schools, and it's a significant amount of money. I do not want kids being preached to there. I do not want to pay for that any more than I would want to drop a dime in a collection plate at a church. People of many religions and non-religion pay for the schools, so the schools should remain neutral.
.
Free speech is limited - however minutely - when public funding is involved. God is off-limits, no matter the speech-giver. In my college speech class, many students chose to give speeches about their religions: specifically some Muslims, Catholics, and a Jehovah's Witness. I was totally cool with that. At the college, they were personally paying for their educations - not me. I was the last speaker, and I chose to give a speech about how all their religions are bullshit. And that's how I handled that.
Category:
News & Politics
Uploaded by DarkMatter2525 on Jun 5, 2011
Even Jesus thinks you're idiots.
Spread this video or make your own so that Bastrop High School, and other such schools, cannot easily get away with this deplorable behavior without being seen by thousands of atheists, secularists, moderates, etc.
Link to Bastrop High School:
http://mpsb.us/education/components/scrapbook/default.php?sectiondetailid=104...
GrapplingIgnorance's excellent video on this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zm89ef4v6i0
Facebook group for Damon Fowler:
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Support-Damon/103714833051042
Damon Fowler explains his story here:
http://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/hed7y/threatened_to_contact_aclu_for...
Why is it unconstitutional?
First, nobody is stopping prayer, but it is public funding of the prayer that's the problem. If I owned a home near Bastrop High School, then the real estate taxes I must pay by LAW would be used for an organized prayer using facilities, equipment, and employees I paid for - AN ATHEIST BEING FORCED BY LAW TO PAY FOR PRAYER. It is obvious that is unconstitutional. If Gabriel Broadway wanted to privately fund a separate meeting for a prayer, she's perfectly within her rights to do so. Bottom line: pray on your own time and your own dime.
.
If you need further elaboration, here is a PM I wrote on the matter:
.
Endorsement is different than accommodation.
.
If a Muslim's religion requires him to pray during school hours (a public school), then by law, the school is not allowed to prevent him from doing so (accommodation). I believe that I have proven beyond the shadow of any doubt, that Christianity doesn't REQUIRE a large public prayer at a graduation ceremony, and that, in fact, the religion actually discourages it. Therefore, it is not unconstitutional to prevent her from doing something like that. A case can be made, however, for her to be stopped from doing something like that if she is using the public's resources in the process (endorsement).
.
I know you don't think this is a big deal, and I can understand why you think so. It can seem petty. As someone who owns a lot of real estate, however, I can look at my tax bills and see exactly how much of my money is going to the schools, and it's a significant amount of money. I do not want kids being preached to there. I do not want to pay for that any more than I would want to drop a dime in a collection plate at a church. People of many religions and non-religion pay for the schools, so the schools should remain neutral.
.
Free speech is limited - however minutely - when public funding is involved. God is off-limits, no matter the speech-giver. In my college speech class, many students chose to give speeches about their religions: specifically some Muslims, Catholics, and a Jehovah's Witness. I was totally cool with that. At the college, they were personally paying for their educations - not me. I was the last speaker, and I chose to give a speech about how all their religions are bullshit. And that's how I handled that.
Category:
News & Politics
QUOTE OF THE DAY
What message am I delivering to the people I love? I deliver truth and love to everyone around me. I use the
word with impeccability to deliver my message, to deliver myself, because I am the message.
~Don Miguel Ruiz
word with impeccability to deliver my message, to deliver myself, because I am the message.
~Don Miguel Ruiz
Saturday, June 11, 2011
QUOTE OF THE DAY
Forgive others. Forgiveness is the only way to heal your emotional wounds. Forgive those who hurt you no matter what they've done because you don't want to hurt yourself every time you remember what they did. When you can touch a wound and it doesn't hurt, then you know you have truly forgiven.
~Don Miguel Ruiz
~Don Miguel Ruiz
Friday, June 10, 2011
Argentine lab clones cow to produce human-like breast milk | The Raw Story
I praise the many, many advances that us human beings have made over the millenia, but seriously, WHEN ARE WE GOING TO STOP FUCKING WITH MOTHER NATURE!?
Argentine lab clones cow to produce human-like breast milk | The Raw Story
BUENOS AIRES (AFP) – An Argentine laboratory announced that it had created the world's first transgenic cow, using human genes that will allow the animal to produce the equivalent of mothers' milk.
"The cloned cow, named Rosita ISA, is the first bovine born in the world that incorporates human genes that contain the proteins present in human milk," Argentina's National Institute of Agrobusiness Technology said in a statement on Thursday.
Rosita ISA was born on April 6 by Ceasarian because she weighed more than 45 kilos (99 pounds), about twice the normal weight of Jersey cows, according to the statement.
As an adult, "the cow will produce milk that is similar to humans," the statement said.
"Our goal was to raise the nutritional value of cows' milk by adding two human genes, the protein lactoferrin, which provides infants with anti-bacterial and anti-viral protection, and lysozyme, which is also an anti-bacterial agent," said researcher Adrian Mutto at a press conference.
The cloning was a joint effort between the Argentine institute and the country's National University of San Martin.
Argentine lab clones cow to produce human-like breast milk | The Raw Story
BUENOS AIRES (AFP) – An Argentine laboratory announced that it had created the world's first transgenic cow, using human genes that will allow the animal to produce the equivalent of mothers' milk.
"The cloned cow, named Rosita ISA, is the first bovine born in the world that incorporates human genes that contain the proteins present in human milk," Argentina's National Institute of Agrobusiness Technology said in a statement on Thursday.
Rosita ISA was born on April 6 by Ceasarian because she weighed more than 45 kilos (99 pounds), about twice the normal weight of Jersey cows, according to the statement.
As an adult, "the cow will produce milk that is similar to humans," the statement said.
"Our goal was to raise the nutritional value of cows' milk by adding two human genes, the protein lactoferrin, which provides infants with anti-bacterial and anti-viral protection, and lysozyme, which is also an anti-bacterial agent," said researcher Adrian Mutto at a press conference.
The cloning was a joint effort between the Argentine institute and the country's National University of San Martin.
QUOTE OF THE DAY
Miracles happen when you forgive. you are born with the capacity to forgive, but you learn the opposite behavior. You learn not to forgive, you practice not to forgive, and you master not to forgive. When you learn to let go of your pride and ask for forgiveness, miracles start to happen in your life.
~Don Miguel Ruiz
~Don Miguel Ruiz
Thursday, June 9, 2011
QUOTE OF THE DAY
Know that truth, forgiveness, and love can heal the world. Imagine if all of us could be truthful with ourselves, start forgiving everyone, and start loving everyone. We would no longer be selfish, gossiping would be over, and we would no longer judge one another. The world would become a place where all of us live in love.
~Don Miguel Ruiz
~Don Miguel Ruiz
Wednesday, June 8, 2011
Guro Bahati Mershant
Guro Bahati Mershant takes you on a trip into Magical and Healing aspect of the Indonesian Martial Arts, in particular the central javanese system of PUSAKA SAKTI LAKUTAMA MATARAM.This Pencak Silat school based in the USA, PENCAK SILAT INTI OMBAK is affiliated with them.
Danni_el and christopher bear- my little heart
Here's a video of Danni El with Cristopher bear doing a little jamming before thier performance:
Upcoming concert dates:
Thursday, June 9, 2011
Artwalk
Between 5&6 and Spring
Street Performance
Time: 7-10 PM
Thursday, June 16, 2011
MezzDowntown L.A
501 S. Spring St.
LA CA 90014
(Alexandria Hotel)
Free Charge
Time: TBA
Thursday, June 17, 2011
Genghis Cohen
740 N. Fairfax
Time: 8:00 pm
Sunday, June 19, 2011
Down and Out
Acoustic Night
@Alexandria Hotel
501 S. Spring St.
LA CA 90014
Time: TBA
Upcoming concert dates:
Thursday, June 9, 2011
Artwalk
Between 5&6 and Spring
Street Performance
Time: 7-10 PM
Thursday, June 16, 2011
MezzDowntown L.A
501 S. Spring St.
LA CA 90014
(Alexandria Hotel)
Free Charge
Time: TBA
Thursday, June 17, 2011
Genghis Cohen
740 N. Fairfax
Time: 8:00 pm
Sunday, June 19, 2011
Down and Out
Acoustic Night
@Alexandria Hotel
501 S. Spring St.
LA CA 90014
Time: TBA
Satoshi Kanazawa and Black Women: Distorting Science
Now we're back to this shit... I thought that doing "scientific" tests on people to "prove" thier supierority, or vise versa, was a thing of the past.
I see now I was dead wrong.
Click below to read the original story...
Satoshi Kanazawa and Black Women: Distorting Science
I see now I was dead wrong.
Click below to read the original story...
Satoshi Kanazawa and Black Women: Distorting Science
YOU GOTTA BE SHITTING ME!!!
Well, I guess you're never too old to want to have parents:
Picking your parents: Adult adoptions on the rise - TODAY Health - TODAY.com
Picking your parents: Adult adoptions on the rise - TODAY Health - TODAY.com
QUOTE OF THE DAY
Be aware of the quality of your communication. The quality of your communication depends on whether you tune your emotional body to love or to fear. If you know what love is and what fear is, you become aware of the way you communicate your dream to others, and you can choose to communicate with love.
~Don Miguel Ruiz
~Don Miguel Ruiz
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
YOU GOTTA BE SHITTING ME!!!
If you read this blog, you'll notice that I put this title in quite a few of my posts.
The reason is that sometimes, I come across something on the news, of on some video, that is so disgusting, so horrid, so unbelievably crazy, that the first words that come to my mind is, "YOU GOTTA BE SHITTING ME!!!"
Well, this is one of those times.
Nursery worker admits horrifying rape of toddler in his care and string of internet child sex charges | Mail Online
The reason is that sometimes, I come across something on the news, of on some video, that is so disgusting, so horrid, so unbelievably crazy, that the first words that come to my mind is, "YOU GOTTA BE SHITTING ME!!!"
Well, this is one of those times.
Nursery worker admits horrifying rape of toddler in his care and string of internet child sex charges | Mail Online
Jilted ex-boyfriend puts up abortion billboard - Yahoo! News
Jilted ex-boyfriend puts up abortion billboard - Yahoo! News
ALAMOGORDO, N.M. (AP) — A New Mexico man's decision to lash out with a billboard ad saying his ex-girlfriend had an abortion against his wishes has touched off a legal debate over free speech and privacy rights.
The sign on Alamogordo's main thoroughfare shows 35-year-old Greg Fultz holding the outline of an infant. The text reads, "This Would Have Been A Picture Of My 2-Month Old Baby If The Mother Had Decided To Not KILL Our Child!"
Fultz's ex-girlfriend has taken him to court for harassment and violation of privacy. A domestic court official has recommended the billboard be removed.
But Fultz's attorney argues the order violates his client's free speech rights.
"As distasteful and offensive as the sign may be to some, for over 200 years in this country the First Amendment protects distasteful and offensive speech," Todd Holmes said.
The woman's friends say she had a miscarriage, not an abortion, according to a report in the Albuquerque Journal.
Holmes disputes that, saying his case is based on the accuracy of his client's statement.
"My argument is: What Fultz said is the truth," Holmes said.
The woman's lawyer said she had not discussed the pregnancy with her client. But for Ellen Jessen, whether her client had a miscarriage or an abortion is not the point. The central issue is her client's privacy and the fact that the billboard has caused severe emotional distress, Jessen said.
"Her private life is not a matter of public interest," she told the Alamogordo Daily News.
Jessen says her client's ex-boyfriend has crossed the line.
"Nobody is stopping him from talking about father's rights. ... but a person can't invade someone's private life."
For his part, Holmes invoked the U.S. Supreme Court decision from earlier this year concerning the Westboro Baptist Church, which is known for its anti-gay protests at military funerals and other high-profile events. He believes the high court's decision to allow the protests, as hurtful as they are, is grounds for his client to put up the abortion billboard.
"Very unpopular offensive speech," he told the Alamogordo Daily News. "The Supreme Court, in an 8 to 1 decision, said that is protected speech."
Holmes says he is going to fight the order to remove the billboard through a District Court appeal.
Here's a link to a VIDEO from The Young Turks talking about this story.
ALAMOGORDO, N.M. (AP) — A New Mexico man's decision to lash out with a billboard ad saying his ex-girlfriend had an abortion against his wishes has touched off a legal debate over free speech and privacy rights.
The sign on Alamogordo's main thoroughfare shows 35-year-old Greg Fultz holding the outline of an infant. The text reads, "This Would Have Been A Picture Of My 2-Month Old Baby If The Mother Had Decided To Not KILL Our Child!"
Fultz's ex-girlfriend has taken him to court for harassment and violation of privacy. A domestic court official has recommended the billboard be removed.
But Fultz's attorney argues the order violates his client's free speech rights.
"As distasteful and offensive as the sign may be to some, for over 200 years in this country the First Amendment protects distasteful and offensive speech," Todd Holmes said.
The woman's friends say she had a miscarriage, not an abortion, according to a report in the Albuquerque Journal.
Holmes disputes that, saying his case is based on the accuracy of his client's statement.
"My argument is: What Fultz said is the truth," Holmes said.
The woman's lawyer said she had not discussed the pregnancy with her client. But for Ellen Jessen, whether her client had a miscarriage or an abortion is not the point. The central issue is her client's privacy and the fact that the billboard has caused severe emotional distress, Jessen said.
"Her private life is not a matter of public interest," she told the Alamogordo Daily News.
Jessen says her client's ex-boyfriend has crossed the line.
"Nobody is stopping him from talking about father's rights. ... but a person can't invade someone's private life."
For his part, Holmes invoked the U.S. Supreme Court decision from earlier this year concerning the Westboro Baptist Church, which is known for its anti-gay protests at military funerals and other high-profile events. He believes the high court's decision to allow the protests, as hurtful as they are, is grounds for his client to put up the abortion billboard.
"Very unpopular offensive speech," he told the Alamogordo Daily News. "The Supreme Court, in an 8 to 1 decision, said that is protected speech."
Holmes says he is going to fight the order to remove the billboard through a District Court appeal.
Here's a link to a VIDEO from The Young Turks talking about this story.
QUOTE OF THE DAY
To begin a great relationship, know what you want. Know what the needs of your body are, what the needs of your mind are, and what fits well with you. There are millions of men and women, and some will make a good match for you and others won't. The two of you only need to be like a key in the lock-a match that works.
~Don Miguel Ruiz
~Don Miguel Ruiz
Monday, June 6, 2011
This Just In...
WHAT'S THE HURRY? IT'S ONLY BEEN 10 FUCKING YEARS NOW...
Afghanistan Withdrawal: 'Congress Is Almost Always Impatient,' Robert Gates Says
By MARY BRUCE, LEEZEL TANGLAO and BEN FORER
June 6, 2011
Although many in Congress see the war in Afghanistan as too costly, "the cost of failure" is high and decisions should not be made using short-term thinking, Defense Secretary Robert Gates told ABC News' Diane Sawyer during an exclusive interview in Kabul, Afghanistan.
"We've invested a huge amount of money here. We've invested 1,254 lives up to this point. So what's the cost of getting it wrong," said Gates. "Congress is almost always impatient. I remember in the spring of 2007, people saying this war is lost in Iraq."
In Kandahar today, Gates told troops he's confident the United States will "strike the right balance" on the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan.
"Nobody wants to give up the gains that have been won at such a hard cost, and nobody wants to give our allies the excuse to run for the exits," Gates told the troops at Forward Operating Base Walton in Kandahar.
Gates said it was a "no-brainer" that combat troops should be the last to leave as he thanked them for their service.
"For my money ... if it were up to me, I would leave the shooters for last," he said.
His trip comes as he evaluates the situation on the ground in Afghanistan, where the US effort costs $10 billion per month, before he retires at the end of June.
"I feel your hardship and your sacrifice and your burden, and that of your families, more than you can possibly know. You are, I believe, the best our country has to offer, and you will be in my thoughts and prayers, every day for the rest of my life. Thank you," Gates told troops today while choking back tears.
Given the troop numbers, however, Gates said the drawdown this summer would likely be a combination of combat and support elements.
The actual timeline of the troop drawdown has yet to be decided, and the defense secretary said Gen. David Petraeus, the current commander of the forces in Afghanistan, and Lt. Gen. John Allen, his successor, will play key roles in deciding that.
"I think the mix of what comes out is really up to Gen. Petraeus and then Gen. Allen in terms of composition and which units are selected," Gates said.
Drones Crucial in War against Terror
While Gates thanked the troops, he also acknowledged that drones have proven to be crucial in the war against terror.
"First of all it has to be acknowledged that these drones have a significant role in taking a lot of Taliban leaders, trainers off the table. The question really then becomes the role of the drones, our relationship with Pakistan and how this all fits together," Gates told "World News" anchor Diane Sawyer.
Watch Diane Sawyer report from Afghanistan tonight and anchor "World News" from Kabul on Monday, June 6.
Gates will be joined by Petraeus, the outgoing commander of the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan (ISAF), Monday for their first joint interview with Sawyer.
The two leaders met on Saturday after Gates arrived in Kabul.
On Saturday, a U.S. missile strike reportedly killed terrorist Ilyas Kashmiri, a contender poised to take over al Qaeda.
Both American and Pakistani officials have said they have not been able to confirm Kasmiri's death.
The report comes as both countries work to on easing tension in the wake of Osama bin Laden's death last month.
"We've gone through a difficult spell with the Pakistani government. The reality is that we need each other. And so working our way through that is a complicated business. It is a complicated relationship. And clearly the drones are a piece of that," Gates told Sawyer.
ABC News Radio and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Click HERE to go to the original article.
Afghanistan Withdrawal: 'Congress Is Almost Always Impatient,' Robert Gates Says
By MARY BRUCE, LEEZEL TANGLAO and BEN FORER
June 6, 2011
Although many in Congress see the war in Afghanistan as too costly, "the cost of failure" is high and decisions should not be made using short-term thinking, Defense Secretary Robert Gates told ABC News' Diane Sawyer during an exclusive interview in Kabul, Afghanistan.
"We've invested a huge amount of money here. We've invested 1,254 lives up to this point. So what's the cost of getting it wrong," said Gates. "Congress is almost always impatient. I remember in the spring of 2007, people saying this war is lost in Iraq."
In Kandahar today, Gates told troops he's confident the United States will "strike the right balance" on the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan.
"Nobody wants to give up the gains that have been won at such a hard cost, and nobody wants to give our allies the excuse to run for the exits," Gates told the troops at Forward Operating Base Walton in Kandahar.
Gates said it was a "no-brainer" that combat troops should be the last to leave as he thanked them for their service.
"For my money ... if it were up to me, I would leave the shooters for last," he said.
His trip comes as he evaluates the situation on the ground in Afghanistan, where the US effort costs $10 billion per month, before he retires at the end of June.
"I feel your hardship and your sacrifice and your burden, and that of your families, more than you can possibly know. You are, I believe, the best our country has to offer, and you will be in my thoughts and prayers, every day for the rest of my life. Thank you," Gates told troops today while choking back tears.
Given the troop numbers, however, Gates said the drawdown this summer would likely be a combination of combat and support elements.
The actual timeline of the troop drawdown has yet to be decided, and the defense secretary said Gen. David Petraeus, the current commander of the forces in Afghanistan, and Lt. Gen. John Allen, his successor, will play key roles in deciding that.
"I think the mix of what comes out is really up to Gen. Petraeus and then Gen. Allen in terms of composition and which units are selected," Gates said.
Drones Crucial in War against Terror
While Gates thanked the troops, he also acknowledged that drones have proven to be crucial in the war against terror.
"First of all it has to be acknowledged that these drones have a significant role in taking a lot of Taliban leaders, trainers off the table. The question really then becomes the role of the drones, our relationship with Pakistan and how this all fits together," Gates told "World News" anchor Diane Sawyer.
Watch Diane Sawyer report from Afghanistan tonight and anchor "World News" from Kabul on Monday, June 6.
Gates will be joined by Petraeus, the outgoing commander of the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan (ISAF), Monday for their first joint interview with Sawyer.
The two leaders met on Saturday after Gates arrived in Kabul.
On Saturday, a U.S. missile strike reportedly killed terrorist Ilyas Kashmiri, a contender poised to take over al Qaeda.
Both American and Pakistani officials have said they have not been able to confirm Kasmiri's death.
The report comes as both countries work to on easing tension in the wake of Osama bin Laden's death last month.
"We've gone through a difficult spell with the Pakistani government. The reality is that we need each other. And so working our way through that is a complicated business. It is a complicated relationship. And clearly the drones are a piece of that," Gates told Sawyer.
ABC News Radio and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Click HERE to go to the original article.
Dancing Jefferson Memorial, Take 2
Well, it went down! After 5 people got arrested for dancing at the jefferson memorial last april (I think), hundreds of people who would not be bootlickers went back to the jefferson memorial to protest and DANCE!!!
Here's a video from You Tube covering the event.
WOULD THOMAS JEFFERSON BE PROUD? I THINK SO.
Here's a video from You Tube covering the event.
WOULD THOMAS JEFFERSON BE PROUD? I THINK SO.
QUOTE OF THE DAY
Accept others the way they are. You cannot change other people. To try to change them to fit what you want them to be is like trying to change a dog into a cat, or a cat into a horse. They are what they are; you are what you are.
~Don Miguel Ruiz
~Don Miguel Ruiz
Sunday, June 5, 2011
Lading Puaka - Malay Martial Art Training Video Trailer
Video description from You Tube:
Uploaded by bobazhar69 on Apr 12, 2011
Trailer Video for Basics and Techniques on usage of Lading in martial arts.
Lading is one of the weapon used in the Malay archipelago. The video is presented by a Lading experten who will be sharing the knowledge.
Will be in DVD format and expected for release by mid 2011.
Category:
Education
Tags:
bobazhar cekak pendusta malay martial arts training video martial art
This Just In...
I THINK SOME VILLAGE IN ALASKA IS MISSING AN IDIOT...
Click HERE to see the original story.
Sarah Palin: ‘I didn’t mess up about Paul Revere’
By David Edwards
Sunday, June 5th, 2011 -- 11:40 am
Failed former Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin insists that she didn't flub the history of Paul Revere.
The former Alaska governor was widely mocked last week when she offered a skewed version of the Revere story.
"He who warned, uh, the British that they weren't going to be taking away our arms uh by ringing those bells and making sure as he's riding his horse through town to send those warning shots and bells that we were going to be secure and we were going to be free and we were going to be armed," she explained to reporters in Boston, Massachusetts Thursday.
"You realized you messed up about Paul Revere?" Fox News host Chris Wallace noted in an interview with Palin Sunday.
"You know what, I didn't mess up about Paul Revere," Palin replied. "Here is what Paul Revere did. He warned the Americans that the British were coming, the British were coming and they were going to try to take our arms and we have to make sure we were protecting ourselves and shoring up all of our ammunitions and our firearms so they couldn't take it."
She continued: "Remember, the British had been there, many soldiers for seven years in that area. Part of Paul Revere's ride -- it wasn't just one ride -- he was a courier, a messenger. Part of the ride was to warn British that we're already there. You are not going to succeed. You are not going to take American arms. You are not going to beat our own well-armed persons, individual private militia we have. He did warn the British."
"In a shout out, gotcha question that was asked of me, I answered candidly. I know my American history," she added.
"Well, I got to tell you, I wasn't sure entirely before I asked you the question," Wallace admitted, "so I went to Google to make sure I knew as much. We both know now."
The detailed account of what happened on April 18, 1775 offered by the Paul Revere House in Boston differs from Palin's.
"Paul Revere was sent for by Dr. Joseph Warren and instructed to ride to Lexington, Massachusetts, to warn Samuel Adams and John Hancock that British troops were marching to arrest them."
Click HERE to see the original story.
Sarah Palin: ‘I didn’t mess up about Paul Revere’
By David Edwards
Sunday, June 5th, 2011 -- 11:40 am
Failed former Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin insists that she didn't flub the history of Paul Revere.
The former Alaska governor was widely mocked last week when she offered a skewed version of the Revere story.
"He who warned, uh, the British that they weren't going to be taking away our arms uh by ringing those bells and making sure as he's riding his horse through town to send those warning shots and bells that we were going to be secure and we were going to be free and we were going to be armed," she explained to reporters in Boston, Massachusetts Thursday.
"You realized you messed up about Paul Revere?" Fox News host Chris Wallace noted in an interview with Palin Sunday.
"You know what, I didn't mess up about Paul Revere," Palin replied. "Here is what Paul Revere did. He warned the Americans that the British were coming, the British were coming and they were going to try to take our arms and we have to make sure we were protecting ourselves and shoring up all of our ammunitions and our firearms so they couldn't take it."
She continued: "Remember, the British had been there, many soldiers for seven years in that area. Part of Paul Revere's ride -- it wasn't just one ride -- he was a courier, a messenger. Part of the ride was to warn British that we're already there. You are not going to succeed. You are not going to take American arms. You are not going to beat our own well-armed persons, individual private militia we have. He did warn the British."
"In a shout out, gotcha question that was asked of me, I answered candidly. I know my American history," she added.
"Well, I got to tell you, I wasn't sure entirely before I asked you the question," Wallace admitted, "so I went to Google to make sure I knew as much. We both know now."
The detailed account of what happened on April 18, 1775 offered by the Paul Revere House in Boston differs from Palin's.
"Paul Revere was sent for by Dr. Joseph Warren and instructed to ride to Lexington, Massachusetts, to warn Samuel Adams and John Hancock that British troops were marching to arrest them."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)